Nobel Prize–winning brain scientist steps down over Epstein ties
Richard Axel resigned from his post co-leading Columbia University’s Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute over his long ties to Jeffrey Epstein
Richard Axel and his wife, Cornelia Bargmann, in 2019.
On Tuesday Nobel Prize winner Richard Axel resigned as co-director Columbia University’s Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute over his decade-long association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A molecular biologist, Axel shared the 2004 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work revealing how the brain identifies odors.
“My past association with Jeffrey Epstein was a serious error in judgment, which I deeply regret,” Axel said in a statement. He also announced he would no longer be an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. “I apologize for compromising the trust of my friends, students, and colleagues,” Axel said in the same statement.
Axel’s resignation came after the Columbia University student newspaper, the Columbia Spectator, reported earlier this month that Axel and his wife were invited to Epstein’s island in 2011—three years after the financier’s conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor—but that the scientist did not go.
On supporting science journalism
If you’re enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
Axel and Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges, had a long, public friendship, with the scientist praising Epstein in a 2007 New York Magazine article. The name “richard axel” appears 933 times in the Department of Justice’s recently created Epstein file library. (Numerous people are mentioned in the files, and their appearance alone does not indicate any wrongdoing.)
Axel is among several high-profile scientists to have been connected to Epstein, who was known for cultivating close connections with academics and science media, including Scientific American. Axel has in the past written two articles for Scientific American; the most recent was published in 1995 and republished in 2006.
In a statement released on Tuesday, Columbia University said that “the University has seen no evidence that Dr. Axel violated any University policy or the law.” Axel will continue his research at the university, according to the statement. Axel did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Scientific American.
Editor’s Note (2/25/26): This is a developing story and may be updated.
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can’t-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world’s best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.
