She’s 56 and caught between two biological truths that don’t seem fair. The hot flashes arrive without warning, soaking through clothes at random moments. And the weight, stubbornly anchored to her belly and hips since menopause, refuses to budge no matter how hard she exercises, how carefully she eats.
She’s not alone. Millions of women navigating the decade after their final period face this same cruel geometry: biology conspires to add pounds while simultaneously cranking up cardiovascular disease risk. Standard obesity treatments help, but incompletely. Now researchers at Mayo Clinic have discovered something that might change how doctors approach postmenopausal women trying to shed weight while managing hot flashes.
The finding emerged from simple detective work. Women taking a new obesity medication called tirzepatide while also using hormone therapy lost significantly more weight than those on the drug alone. The difference was striking. After 18 months, women using hormone therapy shed 19.2 per cent of their bodyweight. Their counterparts managed 14 per cent. That’s 35 per cent greater weight loss simply from adding a treatment most postmenopausal women already use to control the sudden sweats and temperature spikes that plague 70 to 80 per cent of women during menopause. “This study provides important insights for developing more effective and personalized strategies for managing cardiometabolic risk in postmenopausal women,” says Regina Castaneda, the postdoctoral fellow who led the research.
The context matters more than the numbers alone suggest. When estrogen levels plummet after menopause, women’s bodies betray them systematically. Lean muscle declines. Fat redistribution shifts excess weight toward the belly—the most dangerous place metabolically. Energy expenditure drops roughly 5 per cent per decade even without weight gain. Physical activity often declines too, particularly among women whose sleep gets shredded by hot flashes. Together, these shifts ratchet up the pressure. Obesity affects roughly 37 per cent of women in their thirties. By the time they reach their fifties, nearly half carry excess weight. And menopause itself—independent of any weight changes—raises cardiovascular disease risk through effects on lipid metabolism, blood vessel function, and blood pressure. For women, the increase in heart attacks and strokes after menopause eventually matches or exceeds that of men.
Tirzepatide arrived as a breakthrough. The medication targets two appetite-suppressing hormones simultaneously—a dual action that makes it more effective than earlier drugs like semaglutide. But what intrigued the Mayo researchers was an earlier observation: postmenopausal women taking hormone therapy had lost more weight with semaglutide than those without. Had anyone examined whether the same thing happened with tirzepatide?
The research required meticulous detective work. Castaneda and colleagues sifted through records from nearly 16,000 women taking tirzepatide. Only 120 ultimately made the cut: postmenopausal, at least 12 months on the medication, clear menopausal status confirmed through clinical records or hormone testing, consistent adherence to the drug. Of these, 40 used hormone therapy; 80 did not. The researchers matched the groups statistically, controlling for age, baseline weight, diabetes status, prior obesity medication use. This observational design meant the team couldn’t prove causation, but the results warranted attention.
Both groups improved measurably. Blood sugar control strengthened. Blood pressure eased downward. Liver enzymes normalised. Both groups benefited from tirzepatide’s potent effects. But the hormone therapy group advanced further. Women using estrogen alongside tirzepatide saw additional improvements in blood pressure, triglycerides, and liver function. More than half of the hormone therapy group achieved weight loss of 25 per cent or more. Only 20 per cent of the non-hormone group reached that milestone. The difference widened in more dramatic weight loss categories. Those losing 30 per cent or more of their bodyweight included roughly 18 per cent from the hormone therapy group versus just 4 per cent from the others.
Why would hormone replacement amplify tirzepatide’s effect? The mechanisms remain puzzling. Estrogen may enhance the brain’s response to the appetite-suppressing signals that tirzepatide generates. Preclinical studies in rodents suggest estrogen modulates how GLP-1 medications work, the class of drugs that includes tirzepatide. But there’s also a simpler explanation: women relieved of hot flashes often sleep better, feel more energized, and find it easier to maintain dietary changes and physical activity. Relief from vasomotor symptoms might matter as much as the hormones themselves. “It is possible that women using hormone therapy were already engaged in healthier behaviors, or that menopause symptom relief improved sleep and quality of life, making it easier to stay engaged with dietary and physical activity changes,” acknowledges Maria Daniela Hurtado Andrade, the study’s senior author.
That caveat matters. Observational research, which simply observes what happens without random assignment, always harbours hidden confounders. Women choosing hormone therapy might exercise more routinely. They might attend medical appointments more faithfully. They might be more consciously engaged with their own health—what researchers call the “healthy user effect.” These factors could explain the difference without any true biological synergy between estrogen and tirzepatide. The 35 per cent difference is substantial enough to suggest something genuine is happening, but caution remains warranted.
Yet the potential clinical payoff is enormous. Millions of postmenopausal women suffer both vasomotor symptoms and obesity. If hormone therapy genuinely amplifies tirzepatide’s effects, it would provide a dual benefit: symptom relief plus enhanced weight loss, both contributing to reduced cardiovascular risk. Castaneda notes that “preclinical data suggest a potential synergy, with estrogen appearing to enhance the appetite-suppressing effects of GLP-1.” Larger, randomised trials will be needed to test whether this synergy is real. Researchers must measure not just weight loss but also energy expenditure, appetite signalling, and the detailed breakdown of how bodies burn calories. Mechanistic studies—examining insulin sensitivity, inflammation markers, and fat tissue changes—could reveal whether estrogen genuinely potentiates the medication’s power.
For now, the implications remain cautiously optimistic. Hormone therapy, when medically appropriate for managing vasomotor symptoms, might enhance obesity medication’s effectiveness in postmenopausal women. But individualised decision-making is essential. Hormone therapy carries genuine risks—thromboembolic events, stroke, and in some women, breast cancer concerns. Any woman considering the combination needs to weigh benefits against her personal risk profile, which varies based on age since menopause, family history, and other factors. Medicine rarely offers simple certainties.
Still, this research opens a conversation that’s been missing. Too often, menopause gets treated as a cosmetic problem or purely a symptom management issue. The cardiometabolic dimension—how hormonal changes amplify disease risk—receives inadequate attention. And the possibility that optimising hormone status might enhance other treatments, including obesity medications, deserves serious investigation. “If confirmed, this work could speed the development and adoption of new, evidence-based strategies to reduce this risk for millions of postmenopausal women navigating this life stage,” Hurtado Andrade says. For women managing both hot flashes and expanding waistlines, that possibility alone might be worth discussing with their doctor.
Study reference: Castaneda R, et al. The role of menopause hormone therapy in modulating tirzepatide-associated weight loss in postmenopausal women with overweight or obesity: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Obstet Gynaecol Womens Health 2026; published online January 22, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/S3050-5038(25)00145-1
If our reporting has informed or inspired you, please consider making a donation. Every contribution, no matter the size, empowers us to continue delivering accurate, engaging, and trustworthy science and medical news. Independent journalism requires time, effort, and resources—your support ensures we can keep uncovering the stories that matter most to you.
Join us in making knowledge accessible and impactful. Thank you for standing with us!


























































